A university ethics committee considers a confidential report detailing research fraud by a prominent professor.

A university ethics committee considers a confidential report detailing research fraud by a prominent professor. Responding protects 200 students from academic harm, but denies the professor due process.

• 72% chose: Suspend the professor's access to students and labs. (23 people)
• 28% chose: Await formal, attributable complaints against the professor. (9 people)

32 decisions from real people on Resonant. Figures refresh every night at midnight (UTC).

Articles on Classical Trolley Problems · All articles · Resonant · Human Decision Intelligence